Monthly Archives: October 2012

TARGETED INDIVIDUALS: THINKING ALLOWED

 This post is about:

–  Implications of synthetic telepathy.

 – What is meant by ‘synthetic telepathy’.

–  What Targeted Individuals say they    experience. 

–  Technical basis of synthetic telepathy.

‘Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom & no such thing as publick liberty without freedom of speech, Benjamin Franklin, 1722.’

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_thought

UPDATE 21 OCTOBER 2012 15.30-16.45 BST: I HAVE HAD TO REPUBLISH THIS POST OWING TO ACTIONS TAKEN BY PERPETRAITORS

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY- FREEDOM OF THOUGHT IS THE ISSUE

How would you feel if someone far away could listen not only to what you were saying, but also to what you were THINKING!!  And what if that person commented on what you were thinking, in a way that no one else could hear.

That is what synthetic telepathy is about.  It is an invasion of privacy, and a breach of human rights. It offers the opportunity for espionage, impersonation and theft of intellectual property. Most people, including those inside military and state organisations, may not know or really believe it is happening, but corporate criminals within security industries are involved in weaponising thought.  Many Targeted Individuals know all too well what weaponisation of thought is about, because it is with them every waking and sleeping moment of their lives.

‘Freedom of thought (also called the freedom of conscience or ideas) is the freedom of an individual to hold or consider a fact, viewpoint, or thought, independent of others’ viewpoints. It is different from and not to be confused with the concept of freedom of speech or expression.’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_thought.

In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which is legally binding on member states of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, freedom of thought is listed under Article 18:

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observancewww.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_thought

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY IS NOW AN ACKNOWLEDGED PART OF WEAPONS STRATEGIES

Synthetic telepathy refers to a technology that can make you hear real people’s voices broadcast in your head, as if you were hearing a cell-phone conversation.  Perpetraitors can listen to your thoughts too, and you may not be aware they are doing so.  The implications of that are huge, and though the technology has been understood for some time, there is silence about it.  But now synthetic telepathy is becoming openly acknowledged as part of new weapons strategies in the US. Credibility gap?? Check these links:

  • Youtube video demonstrates synthetic telepathy 

All you need to do is point the energy device accurately at the electromagnetic field of the targeted individual, and they will hear the speech transmitted from the microphone.  The Youtube video at the link below demonstrates synthetic telepathy in action.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=veDk2Vd-9oQ&feature=player_embedded#!

  • Pentagon report investigated lasers that put voices in your head:

‘A recently unclassified report from the Pentagon from 1998 has revealed an investigation into using laser beams for a few intriguing potential methods of non-lethal torture. Some of the applications the report investigated include putting voices in people’s heads, using lasers to trigger uncontrolled neuron firing, and slowly heating the human body to a point of feverish confusion – all from hundreds of meters away’. http://phys.org/news122567894.html#jCp, 2008.

  • The Army’s Bold Plan to Turn Soldiers Into Telepaths:

‘The U.S. Army wants to allow soldiers to communicate just by thinking.

The new science of synthetic telepathy could soon make that happen’.

http://discovermagazine.com/2011/apr/15-armys-bold-plan-turn-soldiers-into-telepaths,2011 and www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2127115/Pentagon-plans-telepathic-troops-read-minds–field-years, 2012.

  • Army developing ‘synthetic telepathy’:

‘Similar technology marketed as a way to control video games by thought’…

Read This Thought: The U.S. Army is developing a technology known as synthetic telepathy that would allow someone to create email or voice mail and send it by thought alone. The concept is based on reading electrical activity in the brain using an electroencephalograph, or EEG.’ 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27162401/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/army-developing-synthetic-telepathy/#.UFHxIUITvL8, 2008.

  • Army budgeted $4 million to give soldiers telepathy

The United States Army Research Office budgeted $4 million in 2009 to researchers at the University of California, Irvine to develop EEG processing techniques to identify correlates of imagined speech and intended direction to enable soldiers on the battlefield to communicate via computer-mediated telepathy. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography.

A BIT ABOUT RADIO WAVES: INFRASOUND, MICROWAVES & ULTRASOUND.

From what I have read, it is possible to direct waves at a person’s electromagnetic field and, using a microphone, to speak directly to their inner hearing function, bypassing the ears.  It may be that several types of radio waves could be used for this including infrasound – considered by some to have higher health risks – microwaves, and ultrasound, which has its origins in sonar.  The sound waves may resonate via the bones in the skull, or it could be that the waves are converted to audible speech by the earth, acting as a transducer.  The picture below was removed by perpetrators and had to be replaced. Perhaps this was because it reflects their synthetic telepathy systems too closely.

 

[A transducer is a device that converts one form of energy to another. Energy types include (but are not limited to) electrical, mechanical, electromagnetic (including light), chemical, acoustic or thermal energy.] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transducer

Theoretically, synthetic telepathy could be transmitted via satellite in the same way that satellite TV, long distance cellphones and Global Positioning Satellite data are communicated.  I live in the UK and regularly receive invasive transmissions from different parts of the US, often via a virtual chat room.

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY: TI EXPERIENCES

Many TIs report hearing voices of perpetrators abusing them, impersonating others and trying to manipulate them:

Ti Experience & Source

I had very violent depreciating vile voices or thoughts that came from people in hollywood. Leonardo De Caprio was one of them. Ben Kingsly was another. I have also had Arnold Shwarzenneger.’ Germany, 09/08/2012. http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1112151/pg6
On January 13, 2009 I started to hear a voice that was nearly as loud as normal spoken words. I think that it was about 3 PM. This continued for exactly 10 weeks. As soon as I woke up, within 1 second I heared a message spoken by an angry male voice with aggressive intonation. This was repeated every few seconds the whole day long, until I fell asleep…In the summer of 2011 I heard a voice say regularly “I have cancer.” Then the voice disappeared.http://www.hearingvoices-is-voicetoskull.com/AboutTheAuthor.htm
I hear now voices in my head, which threaten me personally: We will kill you, you are already a zombie! We will erase your memory; We will kill your relatives!; On the 22nd of September you do not go to the demonstration ! Think about your relatives ! We will remove your legs and hands and all other body organs! We will turn you into a zombie! These voices torment me at night and inhibit any sleep. They ask me questions and demand that these are answered.. They affect my free will and control me. Without any doubt my human dignity is permanently violated and as the Human Rights are guaranteed by the German Constitution not only national but international rules of law are violated. www.scribd.com/doc/78957226/250-Cases-Torture-From-Europe.Page 128.

‘Attempted murder by arrhythmia brutal forced effort at maximum power.

Inductions to suicide through “Synthetic telepathy” Sound + + Stimulation (to nudge Stimoceiver) + generation of mental state (5 or 6 days of torture started 24 hr ON apparatus open (10-15 January 2005) + Possible psychoactive (17/70 hz)’

http://www.scribd.com/doc/81271295/Over-300-Satellite-and-Brain-Weapons-Assault-Targeted-Individuals

The point is – THIS IS REAL AND IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOU.

 

 

MY EXPERIENCES OF SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY

When I got targeted, I could hear people talking, quietly, in a different medium from normal hearing, more like what you would hear if you wore headphones.  If friends or family were talking to me, I didn’t notice the voices, but when I was alone, or on waking, I could hear them.  Generally they were talking to each other about me, consciously for me to hear, but sometimes they forgot and started talking to each other.  Very rarely did they address me directly.  That was nearly a year ago, and it continues. 

If you go out to a show, do sport, sing in a choir or watch something interesting on television, it is less likely that you will notice the voices. That may be why TIs report losing their job and becoming more isolated.  Perpetrators want your undivided attention, but they cannot get it unless you are alone or asleep. So if you want to avoid them, go outside, take part in things, and if possible, be around family and friends.

It may seem easy for perpetrators to talk via synthetic telepathy, but I found out they have to learn and practise before they reach a recognised standard, and they have to take an examination. I remember the first time that the perpetrator referred to by his peers as Phillip – the son of the perpetrator referred to as David, was learning how to use the psychotronic head set.  He wanted to talk to his colleagues, but he couldn’t.  They were shouting ‘Take the head-set off!”.  He was talking to me, not them, but didn’t realise it.

TECHNICAL BASIS OF TELEPATHY: SUMMARY

Communicating sounds from one person to another is possible over distances in the same way as with a cell phone, using microwave and lasers/masers.  Just as each person has a cell phone number, each person has their own unique electromagnetic field frequency, which can be identified by sound wave devices of many types, in a similar way to television, you have a transmitter and a receiver, and for long distances, satellite may be necessary.

Electrical activity can best be demonstrated by looking at the way an EEG machine works.  It shows brain wave activity and responses to sounds and other interventions.

But how are microwaves turned into words?  Apparently it is based on measuring blood flow to the brain for different sounds, reflected in electrical activity. A technique called functional magnetic resonance imaging to track blood flow in the brain has shown promise for identifying which words or ideas someone may be thinking about.

So first you dial a person’s frequency number, using a satellite tracking device like GPS.  Then you speak into a headset that translates your brain blood flow patterns into electronic impulses.

There is now a variety of brainwave-reading headsets on the market, mostly used for video gaming’.  Headset picture and quote from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15200386 and http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10647555

The electrical impulses are pointed by a focused laser/maser beam towards someone’s electromagnetic field and they pick up the resonance via the bones in their skull and ear. The impulses are translated into words by the brain in the same way as for normal speech.  Satellite is used except where both people are located nearby. Satellite tracking implies that the person receiving the call has an implant that transmits a frequency signal, but this is not always required. 

HOW SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY WORKSMeasuring Blood flow to the brain  

A new brain scanner has been developed to help people who are completely paralysed speak by enabling them to spell words using their thoughts.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18644084

fMRI is usually used to track brain activity by measuring blood flow.’ 

In June 2012 the BBC reported that  ’A new brain scanner has been developed to help people who are completely paralysed speak by enabling them to spell words using their thoughts.

It uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to help patients choose between 27 characters – the alphabet and a blank space… fMRI is normally used to track brain activity by measuring blood flow… Each character produces a different pattern of blood flow in the brain, and the device interprets these patterns…The study appears in Current Biology journal of Cell Press.  Bettina Sorger of Maastricht University in The Netherlands, one of the researchers working on the current study, told the BBC:

“The work of Adrian Owen and colleagues led me to wonder whether it might even become possible to use fMRI, mental tasks, and appropriate experimental designs to freely encode thoughts, letter-by-letter, and therewith enable back-and-forth communication in the absence of motor behavior.”

The team writes in the paper that because the noninvasive device requires “only little effort and pre-training, it is immediately operational and possesses high potential for clinical applications. www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18644084

 SCIENCE DECODES ‘INTERNAL VOICES’  

On 1 February 2012 the BBC reported that ‘By studying patterns of blood flow related to particular images, Jack Gallant’s group at the University of California Berkeley showed in September that patterns can be used to guess images being thought of – recreating “movies in the mind”. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16811042

The team focused on an area of the brain called the superior temporal gyrus, or STG. This broad region is not just part of the hearing apparatus but one of the “higher-order” brain regions that help us make linguistic sense of the sounds we hear.  According to the BBC, researchers at University of California Berkeley: ‘have demonstrated a striking method to reconstruct words, based on the brain waves of patients thinking of those words. 

 

The technique reported in PLoS Biology relies on gathering electrical signals directly from patients’ brains. Based on signals from listening patients, a computer model was used to reconstruct the sounds of words that patients were thinking of. The method may in future help comatose and locked-in patients communicate.

Several approaches have in recent years suggested that scientists are closing in on methods to tap into our very thoughts; the current study achieved its result by implanting electrodes directly into a part of participants’ brains: The discovery of language – electrical brain wave patterns:

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16811042.  The technique hinges on plotting brain activity across a number of frequencies

 

Science decodes ‘internal voices’, BBC News

 

In a 2011 study, participants with electrodes in direct brain contact were able to move a cursor on a screen by simply thinking of vowel sounds..The team employed a computer model that helped map out which parts of the brain were firing at what rate, when different frequencies of of sound were played.

With the help of that model, when patients were presented with words to think about, the team was able to guess which word the participants had chosen. They were even able to reconstruct some of the words, turning the brain waves they saw back into sound on the basis of what the computer model suggested those waves,meant.

REAL-LIFE JEDI: PUSHING THE LIMITS OF MIND CONTROL 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15200386

On 10 October 2011 the BBC reported on a headset, developed by Australian company Emotiv for the games industry, which used software connected to various electronic devices. The headset has been around for some time, but it is only now that companies such as IBM are beginning to harness the wealth of data that it can provide.  Using software developed in-house, researchers have linked the Emotiv to devices such as a model car, a light switch and a television.

Control signals come from two main sources; electroencephalography (EEG) measurements of brain activity, and readings of nerve impulses as they travel outwards to the muscles…At Brown Institute for Brain Science in the US, scientists are busy inserting chips right into the human brain. The technology, dubbed BrainGate, sends mental commands directly to a PC.

Subjects still have to be physically “plugged” into a computer via cables coming out of their heads, in a setup reminiscent of the film The Matrix. However, the team is now working on miniaturising the chips and making them wireless. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15200386

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY OPERATIONS

There are various modes of operation for synthetic telepathy including:

 

  • One person listening to another’s thoughts or speech;
  • Listening in a group to another’s thoughts and speech;
  • Talking and listening to one person;
  • Talking to one person and being listened to by many people;
  • A virtual chat room in which anyone could talk or listen, if they followed set procedures.

 

‘Synthetic telepathy requires techniques for scanning the specific brain emissions given off when the targeted victim subvocalises. The techniques must be able to detect the 15-Hz, 5-milliwatt auditory cortex brain emissions that are linked with sound that bypasses the ear; the ELF frequencies that are linked with the excitation potentials in the brain that are associated with subvocalised thought; and EEG signals, such as the P300 signals mentioned previously’*

 

Picture opposite: – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15200386

 

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_telepathy at http://geeldon.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/synthetic-telepathy-also-known-as-techlepathy-or-psychotronics/

‘Contrary to popular belief, synthetic telepathy does not provide the ability to read a person’s mind or memories. What it does provide is the ability to read the internal monologue (or anything that causes electrical change/radiation) and the trick is to get the subject to “voice” their memories and cross-reference that with their emotional state. In other words, basic psychological manipulation is a key factor and makes the technology not much more reliable than a standard lie-detector test. In practice, passive monitoring of the internal monologue over a long time period (months-years) is probably the most effective method of intelligence gathering. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_telepathy at http://geeldon.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/synthetic-telepathy-also-known-as-techlepathy-or-psychotronics/

USING ELECTOENCEPHALOGRAPHY  (EEG)

The device that makes the leap from  electronic brain impulses into words is said to be an electroencephalograph or EEG. In clinical contexts, EEG refers to the recording of the brain’s spontaneous electrical activity over a short period of time, usually 20–40 minutes, as recorded from multiple electrodes placed on the scalp. EEG used to be a first-line method for the diagnosis of tumours, stroke and other focal brain disorders, but this use has decreased with the advent of anatomical imaging techniques with high spatial resolution such as MRI and CT. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography

 

Picture below: The first human EEG recording obtained by Hans Berger in 1924. The upper tracing is EEG, and the lower is a 10 Hz timing signal. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography

 

 

According to Wikipedia:  ‘Derivatives of the EEG technique include ‘evoked potentials’, which involves averaging the EEG activity time-locked to the presentation of a stimulus of some sort (visual, somatosensory, or auditory)’‘Event-related potentials (ERPs) refer to averaged EEG responses that are time-locked to more complex processing of stimuli; this technique is used in cognitive science, cognitive psychology, and psychophysiological research‘. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography.

What that means is that when perpetraitors inflict something on a TI,  they can see that event reflected in TI brain waves recorded on a machine. ‘Event-related potentials’ refers to the machine read-out of the TI’s reaction to being tortured, abused or harassed by perpetraitors.

 TEXT-TO-SPEECH SYSTEMS

In her acclaimed book ‘1996’*, author Gloria Naylor describes in her fictionalized memoir how she was exposed to synthetic telepathy. Perpetraitor technology at that time involved a small satellite dish with a lap-top computer connected to it.  Perpetrators typed in the words they wanted Gloria to hear, and that translated into ‘heard thought’ in her perception.  The method described is similar to a Text-to-Speech system. Perpetraitors removed the picture above several times in an attempt to prevent it being published.  

*Third World Press, Chicago, 2005.

Technology has advanced since 1996, and from what I have observed, there is now no need for typing text onto a computer in order to create synthetic telepathy. Perpetraitors speak directly into microphones, and speech recognition equipment is used with computer-brain interface instead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain–computer_interface.

PULSED MICROWAVES: THE BASIS OF SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY

According to John J. McMurtry, in his article ‘*Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence’:

‘A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound and indicated voice transmission. The report states, “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities.” Among microwave weapon implications are “great potential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.”+

 APPLICATION OF PULSED MICROWAVES

‘An Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command report affirms microwave speech transmission… “One decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created” quotes the report.’…

MICROWAVE AUDITORY EFFECT

“Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” is the title of a small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: “The feasibility of the concept has been established” using both low and high power systems…

Such a contract’s purpose is elaborated by the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible.

Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.” Robert Becker, whose eminence was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in biological electromagnetic fields research, is more explicit: “Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with “voices” or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.”++

Not all commentators are impressed with synthetic telepathy’s application on a battle field: 

Synthetic telepathy has limited uses as a communication system unless direct-contact headset systems are used and supported by encrypted channels. As such, standard radios are more effective in combat situations. Synthetic telepathy also requires the thought stream to be processed,+ which results in a minor lapse of attention, rather like a daydream, that could have deadly consequences on the battlefield.’ + My emphasis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_telepathy at http://geeldon.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/synthetic-telepathy-also-known-as-techlepathy-or-psychotronics/

1975 – A.W. Guy describes pulsed microwave effect

According to Richard Alan Miller, a researcher called A. W. Guy observed the effects of pulsed microwaves on humans. He noted that low levels of microwave energy could penetrate the skull and heat up the brain cells, causing expansion of brain tissue at cellular level. This caused a sound wave to pass from the skull to the ear, creating the microwave auditory effect.+++

*John J. McMurtrey, M. S.Copyright 2003, 23 Dec. 2003. Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email- Johnmcmurt@aol.com Phone- 410-539-5140.

+ “Surveillance Technology, 1976: policy and implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a staff report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the Judiciary. United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, p 1280, US GOV DOC Y 4.J 882:SU 7/6/976.

++ Becker RO and Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life Quill William Morrow, New York, p 319 & 320, 1985.

+++SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY AND THE EARLY MIND WARS By Richard Alan Miller, copyright 2001, [Presented at the Consciousness Technologies Conference-July 19-21, 2001,on Saturday, July 20th, 2001, in Sisters, OR], updated 03/04/2003, http://www.nwbotanicals.org/oak/newphysics/synthtele/synthtele.html

ULTRASOUND CAN ALSO BE USED FOR SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY – PATENTS

John J. McMurtrey also cites patents for ultrasound as the basis for synthetic telepathy:

‘Internal voice capability, without discernment by others nearby. is also evident in ultrasound-based technology. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non- lethal weapon application against crowds or directed at an individual…’

‘Norris Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”, directionally produces sound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams. The cancellation leaves the carried audible sound perceivable. The effect becomes apparent particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from any surface’.

Source: ‘*Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence’:John J. McMurtrey, M. S.Copyright 2003, 23 Dec. 2003. Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email- Johnmcmurt@aol.com Phone- 410-539-5140.

WHAT CAN WE DO TO PROTECT OURSELVES FROM INTRUSIVE SILENT SPEECH/SOUND?

At the moment, Targeted Individuals do not have a lot of choice, because of the costs of shielding. There is no point in covering just our ears or head, because our whole body is enclosed in an electromagnetic field that operates like a TV satellite dish.  We need to be in a shielded environment.  Solutions do exist, and clearly where  government and state operations are involved, specialist security equipment must provide appropriate shielding.      

 

Picture opposite: Electromagnetic shielding cages inside a disassembled mobile phone.

Here are some examples of shielding materials:

  • Acoustic or silent glass, available as double glazing
  • Leaded glass
  • Silicon / plastic-based materials in walls, roofs and windows
  • Metal sheeting and wire such as used in microwave ovens.

These may not be easily affordable or practical for every-day life, but it is worth knowing they exist.  Jamming devices are another option, and they are more affordable, but they may have health risks, just as microwaves may do. Tall office blocks encased in green glass are likely to be sound-proof against synthetic eavesdropping, as are airports and modern deluxe airport hotels.

But what happens when the state representatives go home after their meetings?  What about all those intelligence, security and military personnel around the world who don’t discuss classified material, but know about it?  What if someone tries to listen to what they are thinking by pointing a microwave auditory device at them?  My theory is that they must have some kind of implanted devices, that operate radio wave jamming frequencies.  If so, that may work in the short-term, but it is not doing the health of such people any good.

This post was altered by perpetrators while I was preparing to publish it, and after it had been published. Only IT technicians have access permissions to do that, but family influence can be brought to bear. The main perpetrator involved was referred to by others as Philip, a trainee IT technician, the son of the perpetrator referred to by others as David. Based in England, on an overseas military base near where I live, Philip has been part of a group of new entrant perpetraitors participating in training in the US, with his father acting as mentor. As a trainee, he is still on probation, wherever his current location may be.

Posted 6 days ago by Martina Cable

Labels: Psychotronics Infrasound Targeted Individuals Electronic Harassment Mind Control Synthetic Telepathy Ultrasound Implants.

 

 

Like 0

0

 

Add a comment

 

 

Advertisements

TARGETED INDIVIDUALS: SPEAKING PERSONALLY

ON A PERSONAL NOTE

I never expected to be writing this, but here goes:

As a result of recent posts, the perpetrator ‘David’ decided to take revenge by attacking me with a non standard electronic device which is illegal for use against civilians in some countries, including the US.  It uses Extremely Low Frequency which when directed at the vital organs can lead to death in various ways.

David usually targets the lower intestine, which results in immediate shaking, expansion and contraction of the bowel, creating liquefaction. Longer-term results are cancers of the intestine, but fast-acting intestinal cancers can be created in a short time as well.

What I did not realise was that he had just targeted a close member of my family for the third time, using the ELF device on this occasion.  He targeted that same family member three times altogether, creating other cancers each time.

Why? Because it appears he had come into contact with both of us, separately, at different times, through his former employment, before he left the country under a cloud, to work in the US. And I understand that other women he met through his work have also been targeted.

His reputation for attacking women in this way was so well known that those with whom he associated gave him some strong warnings in no uncertain terms. This left a permanent mark on his health. He has intestinal problems.

Why was he not removed from his present post?  He trusted in the protection of a group of people who, often unsung heroes and heroines, have done much to help poor people of the type he prefers to target – widows and orphans.  Ironically, it never occurred to him that my family also had connections to that same organisation.  Though no longer living, there are three men who if they could, would be taking a keen interest in the proceedings.

I was horrified to discover that he did not exclude women in his own family from targeting, even his children.  He also forced members of his family, who had access to electronic equipment, to target people on his behalf. Because of his disability, men with nobler motives and higher principles stopped short of removing him from his post.  But you have to realise, he will carry on indefinitely until he is stopped.  How many lives of women and children has he scarred or terminated?  Even he cannot remember.  The illegal electronic weapons that are his personal possessions must be destroyed, and he must be prevented from causing further harm to others.

Update:

Under normal perpetraitor arrangements, all activation of electronic equipment is carried out by IT technicians, who do not participate in synthetic telepathic communication with Targeted Individuals. It appears that David used to be an IT technician, but was removed from that work because of his known tendency to torture women and to depart from authorised activities.  However he can and does go into the IT technician section, presumably when no other IT technicians are there,  in order to carry on his unauthorised activities.

It appears that for routine targeting of individuals, the person engaging in synthetic telepathic communication with the individual sends a request for targeting to the IT technician, who activates it.  The person talking should not normally be the person who uses a pointer on the screen to target different parts of the TI’s body.  What is not clear is the extent to which separation of the two roles is complied with.  If David could get away with it, how may others could be doing the same thing?